Skip to content

Emily Windsor Cragg: My Claim to the UK Crown & Throne

February 6, 2015

Emily Windsor Cragg, daughter of King Edward VIII, files claim to UK Crown with UK Parliament, charges Elizabeth II with Treason

* News Inside Out
* Alfred Lambremont Webre

* www.holyconservancy.org

Source here.

ROYAL DUTIES AS A CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCH,
CORONATION OATH, HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH II,  JUNE 2, 1953
REASON :: NOT PAYING ATTENTION TO CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

CONTENTS

1. June 2, 1953, Coronation Vows:  “REIGN” VS. “RULE”
2. Defaults in ROYAL COVENANT OBLIGATIONS as if nonexistent.
3. Adding Efforts to Confuse the Public, a political strategy for world dominance
4. Looking Away, “NOT-SEE”ing EU-HEGEMONY as Predation on Peoples.

–Pedophilia, Human-trafficking & Serial Wars, ALL in fact “just bidness,” no one accountable for harm.

–Debt & Class Bankruptcies, Bank Usury and investment fraud are running rampant, uncorrected.

–Wars for profits & prophets occur for PC-population reduction en masse, genocide & omnicide at work.

–Radiological Contamination. The Crown is a primary purveyor, processor & marketing agency for reactive and depleted uranium used in fission reactors and armaments in the world.

5. LAWS of Marriage and Bloodline.
6. Tavistock Institute’s Goal to OVERRULE Morality & Civil Ethics.
7. UNESCO’s Common Core Sex Ed Curricula
8. Parties of the First Part, in the Royal Succession.
9. Looking to a Future to Live In.

June 2, 1953, Queen’s Coronation Vows:  “REIGN” VS. “RULE”

Transcript of the original Coronation video, herein is the dialogue between the Queen and officials of the Church of England at Her Majesty’s Coronation.

. . .  dedicating herself before God, to the service of her subjects.”

“Madam, is Your Majesty willing to take the Oath?”

[HRM states] : “I am willing.”

“Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and northern Ireland–Canada, Australia, New Zealand, . . . according to their respective laws and customs?”

[HRM states] : “I solemnly promise so to do.”

“Will you to your power, cause Law and Justice in mercy to be executed in all your judgments?”

[HRM states] : “I will.”

“Will you, to the utmost of your power, maintain the Laws of God and the true profession of the gospel?  “Will you to the utmost of your power, maintain in the United Kingdom, the Protestant Reformed religion established by law? “Will you maintain and preserve invoil­able, the settlement of the Church of England–and the doctrine, worship, discipline and government thereof, as by Law established in England? And will you preserve unto the Bishops and Clergy of England, and of the churches there committed to their charge, all such rights and privileges as by law do or shall appertain to them or any of them?”

[HRM states] : “All this I promise to do.”

. . . [HRM states] : “The things which I have herebefore promised, I will perform and keep, so help me God.”

IS THIS CLEAR ENOUGH?

In a Constitutional Monarchy, it is Members of Parliament who Rule by Law (legislation of Law and Statute Codes) while the Sovereign reigns. The Monarch serves a function similar to checks-and-balances in the United States Constitu­tion. So Parliament is charged with crafting statutes, once the founda­tional Laws for the country are in place. It is fitting under such a Constitutional Monarchy for the King or Queen to operate by powers listed below.

CONTINUE READING

From → World Watch

2 Comments
  1. flyer168 permalink

    “Emily Windsor Cragg, daughter of King Edward VIII”

    “…They were asked if they ever wondered “what could have been”; obviously the answer was yes.

    It would be going against human nature if they didn’t. But David couldn’t answer the question. He sat there looking uncomfortable, then stuttered a bit, rambled on, and eventually said no.

    Wallis said nothing, and just gave David her death-stare. The moment was much discussed, and has since appeared in every non-terrible documentary made on their lives. To me their reaction actually makes a lot of sense.

    There is no way in hell that either Wallis or David didn’t sometimes think of how things might have gone differently. But they were reluctant to admit to anything that might imply they weren’t totally happy because they knew how the haters would interpret it. One thing that clip definitely disproves is the idea they were miserable and their marriage was only a front.

    Those two couldn’t tell a convincing lie to save their lives. Had either one of them been a decent liar that whole awkward moment wouldn’t have happened. Wallis was supposedly this master manipulator who was capable of faking all of her feelings for David, yet she couldn’t chime in with some suitable answer or even conceal her obvious discomfort and anger at David’s lack of a response? More witchcraft, obviously.”

    Wallis Simpson – http://vintage-royalty.tumblr.com/wallis

    “… Elizabeth Kelman, of Marysville, Tennessee, is really the long-lost daughter of Edward VIII and Wallis Warfield Simpson. The child was born in the summer of 1934 (while Wallis was still married to Ernest Simpson) Wallis and Edward were told that the child had died; in reality it had been spirited to the US and “replaced” the newborn child of a couple in Marietta, Ohio. She was raised in complete ignorance of her true parentage, by (AFAICT) a couple who genuinely believed her to be their own daughter. She’s only recently come into the knowledge of her true heritage.

    And how did she come to know it?

    Why, God told her: Quote:

    On Christmas eve, 1995, in Maryville, Tennessee U.S.A., God revealed a secret that had been hidden for sixty-one years. He gave to a woman named Elizabeth Kelman her true identity, which had been stolen from her at birth, and was never intended to be returned. Evidently, Elizabeth had been born in England in June of 1934.

    Her true parents were later to be known as the Duke and Duchess of Windsor.”

    Edward and Wallis’s long lost child
    http://we3.org/

    “It is our intention to demonstrate here, to a reasonable degree, that on June 3rd, of 1934, in London, Wallis Warfield Simpson, the future Duchess of Windsor, gave birth to the only child she was to have. The father of her child was Edward, her future husband, the Duke of Windsor, who was then the Prince of Wales.

    Wallis and Edward were told that their child had died at birth. What had begun a few months earlier as a joyful secret had now become a secret tragedy. Wallis and Edward privately commemorated their child through hidden meanings contained within their jewelry, photographs, and letters to each other. Their tragic secret, that they could not possibly have shared with many others, was an unknown additional bond between them, and this together with his love for Wallis, made Edward’s decision to marry her irrevocable.

    Unbeknownst to Wallis and Edward their child, their daughter, had not died. She had been placed in another identity, where, even if they were to realize that they had been deceived they could never find her. She had been taken to the United States of America, where she replaced a newborn baby at a hospital after that baby’s birth on June 8th, of 1934, near the small town of Marietta, Ohio. Her name was now Elizabeth Marie Francis, and she was to never be reunited with her true parents…”

    http://we3.org/fullstory.html

    “…Dr. Kelman, Elizabeth’s husband, left Blount County to go into practice at Gastonia, N.C., and eventually wound up living in Hawaii where his first wife died.

    A year later, he met and later married Elizabeth and they moved to Blount County in 1988. In 1992 they took possession of the former Sterchi Brothers Furniture store location, across from Broadway Towers.

    There, exhibited in the display windows at the front of the store, are scores of photographs of the royal family, Mrs. Simpson, and Elizabeth and her sons taken at comparable ages. The pictures obviously reflect look-alike features and expressions. It is a collection put together from the extensive research of Elizabeth and her family over the past two years which has also resulted in a good collection of applicable reference books and some video tapes. A tape of King Edward and Wallis narrated by Orson Welles which was made while the couple was living in exile in France is particularly interesting.

    It is highly unlikely that if any records exist they will be uncovered. It is difficult for us as Americans to understand the power of royalty and the loyalty of many of the subjects of royal families. Quite often it could be said that loyalty to royalty often exceeds the loyalty to one’s country…”

    http://we3.org/newsarticles.html

    You be the judge.

    Shalom.

  2. flyer168 permalink

    “King Edward VIII & Wallis Simpson”

    Ewoon,

    Also to share this…

    “British Secret Service agent Wallis Simpson competes with Winifred Wagner for the title “youngest spy ever recruited by MI6.” Her antecedents were the Warfields and the Montagues of Baltimore, Maryland. Maryland was a British spying base since its founding by the Calverts and Carrolls in 1629…

    …The Archbishop of Canterbury insisted that Stanley Baldwin demand a medical examination to make sure that Wallis Simpson could produce an heir to the throne.

    The king knew she would NEVER pass as a female so he declined the examination…”

    http://www.reformation.org/british-secret-agent-wallis-simpson.html.

    Wallis Simpson, the Nazi minister, the telltale monk and an FBI plot – http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2002/jun/29/research.monarchy

    http://aangirfan.blogspot.com/2013/12/royal-sex.html

    You be the judge.

    Shalom.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: