Emily Windsor Cragg: My Claim to the UK Crown & Throne
Emily Windsor Cragg, daughter of King Edward VIII, files claim to UK Crown with UK Parliament, charges Elizabeth II with Treason
ROYAL DUTIES AS A CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCH,
CORONATION OATH, HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH II, JUNE 2, 1953
REASON :: NOT PAYING ATTENTION TO CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
1. June 2, 1953, Coronation Vows: “REIGN” VS. “RULE”
2. Defaults in ROYAL COVENANT OBLIGATIONS as if nonexistent.
3. Adding Efforts to Confuse the Public, a political strategy for world dominance
4. Looking Away, “NOT-SEE”ing EU-HEGEMONY as Predation on Peoples.
–Pedophilia, Human-trafficking & Serial Wars, ALL in fact “just bidness,” no one accountable for harm.
–Debt & Class Bankruptcies, Bank Usury and investment fraud are running rampant, uncorrected.
–Wars for profits & prophets occur for PC-population reduction en masse, genocide & omnicide at work.
–Radiological Contamination. The Crown is a primary purveyor, processor & marketing agency for reactive and depleted uranium used in fission reactors and armaments in the world.
5. LAWS of Marriage and Bloodline.
6. Tavistock Institute’s Goal to OVERRULE Morality & Civil Ethics.
7. UNESCO’s Common Core Sex Ed Curricula
8. Parties of the First Part, in the Royal Succession.
9. Looking to a Future to Live In.
June 2, 1953, Queen’s Coronation Vows: “REIGN” VS. “RULE”
Transcript of the original Coronation video, herein is the dialogue between the Queen and officials of the Church of England at Her Majesty’s Coronation.
. . . dedicating herself before God, to the service of her subjects.”
“Madam, is Your Majesty willing to take the Oath?”
[HRM states] : “I am willing.”
“Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and northern Ireland–Canada, Australia, New Zealand, . . . according to their respective laws and customs?”
[HRM states] : “I solemnly promise so to do.”
“Will you to your power, cause Law and Justice in mercy to be executed in all your judgments?”
[HRM states] : “I will.”
“Will you, to the utmost of your power, maintain the Laws of God and the true profession of the gospel? “Will you to the utmost of your power, maintain in the United Kingdom, the Protestant Reformed religion established by law? “Will you maintain and preserve invoilable, the settlement of the Church of England–and the doctrine, worship, discipline and government thereof, as by Law established in England? And will you preserve unto the Bishops and Clergy of England, and of the churches there committed to their charge, all such rights and privileges as by law do or shall appertain to them or any of them?”
[HRM states] : “All this I promise to do.”
. . . [HRM states] : “The things which I have herebefore promised, I will perform and keep, so help me God.”
IS THIS CLEAR ENOUGH?
In a Constitutional Monarchy, it is Members of Parliament who Rule by Law (legislation of Law and Statute Codes) while the Sovereign reigns. The Monarch serves a function similar to checks-and-balances in the United States Constitution. So Parliament is charged with crafting statutes, once the foundational Laws for the country are in place. It is fitting under such a Constitutional Monarchy for the King or Queen to operate by powers listed below.